�鶹AV

Authors: J. A. Jones; P. M. Groffman; J. Blair; F. W. Davis; H. Dugan; E. E. Euskirchen; S. D. Frey; T. K. Harms; E. Hinckley; M. Kosmala; S. Loberg; S. Malone; K. Novick; S. Record; A. V. Rocha; B.L. Ruddell; E. H. Stanley; C. Sturtevant; A. Thorpe; T. White; W. R. Wieder; L Zhai; K. Zhu.

Source: Earth's Future, 8, e2020EF001631.

Publication type: Article

Abstract: Many research and monitoring networks in recent decades have provided publicly available data documenting environmental and ecological change, but little is known about the status of efforts to synthesize this information across networks. We convened a working group to assess ongoing and potential cross‐network synthesis research and outline opportunities and challenges for the future, focusing on the US‐based research network (the US Long‐Term Ecological Research network, LTER) and monitoring network (the National Ecological Observatory Network, NEON). LTER‐NEON cross‐network research synergies arise from the potentials for LTER measurements, experiments, models, and observational studies to provide context and mechanisms for interpreting NEON data, and for NEON measurements to provide standardization and broad scale coverage that complement LTER studies. Initial cross‐network syntheses at co‐located sites in the LTER and NEON networks are addressing six broad topics: how long‐term vegetation change influences C fluxes; how detailed remotely‐sensed data reveal vegetation structure and function; aquatic‐terrestrial connections of nutrient cycling; ecosystem response to soil biogeochemistry and microbial processes; population and species responses to environmental change; and disturbance, stability and resilience. This initial work offers exciting potentials for expanded cross‐network syntheses involving multiple long‐term ecosystem processes at regional or continental scales. These potential syntheses could provide a pathway for the broader scientific community, beyond LTER and NEON, to engage in cross‐network science. These examples also apply to many other research and monitoring networks in the US and globally, and can guide scientists and research administrators in promoting broad‐scale research that supports resource management and environmental policy.

Plain Language Summary: Today many research networks and monitoring networks exist in ecology and environmental science. Their complementary designs and publicly available results and data can create powerful synergies. Long‐term, hypothesis‐based mechanistic research can provide context and explanations for data produced by monitoring networks while the standardization and broad coverage of monitoring networks can provide context for long‐term ecological research. Recent efforts have combined results and data from two US‐based science networks: the Long‐Term Ecological Research (LTER) network and the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON). We describe how these initial efforts could be expanded in six broad areas, that would provide opportunities for the broader scientific community to engage with LTER and NEON, and may also be relevant to other cross‐network syntheses in the US and globally.

Department of Biology